Devious interviewing tactics in the coming months
March 29, 2011 4 Comments
How to prepare for these abrasive tactics. What will recruiters be looking for?
The Bad News:
The field of recruiting (internal and external) is encouraging harsher interviewing schemes to wash out more candidates. Supported by two surveys, Garret Miller is zealously promoting a callous approach in order to not make costly hiring decisions in his article 7 Tips for Hiring Great Employees, published in the March 2011 issue of HVACR Business, a trade journal.
The two surveys:
SurePayroll Inc. asked small business owners to quantify the cost of a poor hiring decision; resulting in approximately $10,000 per hire.
Leadership IQ: “…nearly half of all new hires (46%) fail within 18 months…” “Managers indicated they believed the most common reason for the high failure rate was because “flaws were over looked during the interview process.”
Garret’s strategy has four main points that each candidate must “pass” in order to be considered for the position: Work ethic, Humility, Integrity, and Maturity. Otherwise known as WHIM strategy, in his book titled Hire on a WHIM.
The Good News:
According to the same article, many industries will find themselves “…in a hiring frenzy this decade…” due to many reaching the retirement age. As such you can prepare and succeed for your battle with HR, the recruiter, or decision-maker by knowing what questions they will be asking and how to answer them.
The following tips will probably be reformatted to the particular organization, field, and/or industry. Therefore you must analyze the posting and any interviews you have had thus far for the position in order to help you prepare for the next encounter.
Garret’s Tips
- “Listen” to the resume.
Garret’s advice to recruiters: analyze the resume for patterns in overlapping activities, jobs, length of employment, work settings, and job structures.The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: You can control this by analyzing your knowledge, skills, and abilities; developing strong examples and communicating them through your materials. If you are tailoring your materials to a specific job, remove all extraneous examples and concentrate on providing examples that strictly match the posting. In other words, be the custom designed solution to their needs. - Assess their Work ethic.
Garret’s advice to recruiters: have candidates illustrate, in detail, their academic and/or employment experience. Pay attention to positive and negative emotions, passion and enthusiasm, or the lack thereof.The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: The interviewer is looking to find out anything that might rattle you. When they find something they will dig deeper and deeper until you “fail” the question, thus reducing the applicant pool by one more. Be prepared to discuss your work history, learn it, memorize it, memorize your achievements and failures. Develop positive outcomes for either the company, customer, or yourself. Positive outcomes for you would probably include learning something and then being able to apply it to other similar situations. Be prepared to end on that positive note. This communicates a willingness to learn and grow with the position. - Discern their Humility.
Garret’s advice to recruiters: Have the candidate explain the last process they had to learn. With a follow-up question on what the candidate felt was their most humbling moment and what they learned it.The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: This question is designed to find out two things 1) can you ask for advice or help from another, and 2) to determine your preferred working conditions.Communicate your intelligence by recognizing you are not an island, that you do not exist in a vacuum. Though you might enjoy trying to figure the puzzle out on your own, fear of asking for help or advice is a weakness an organization cannot afford. There are pros and cons to working either alone or with others: “We all bring different skill sets to the table, those that are my specialty – I can handle. Those that are not my specialty, I turn to those subject matter experts.” If you convey to the interviewer that you mostly prefer to work in groups or alone, they may see a potential problem for the organization in the future.The follow up question on your most “humbling moment” is designed to see you get uncomfortable, see how you react to stress. We all have regrets and personal secrets; you are not required to tell an interviewer your absolute most humbling (embarrassing) experience; the question also included a second part about what you learned from it. Okay so we have all screwed up in our lives, design your answer around the mistake you had the most positive learning experience from.
- Determine their Integrity.
Garret’s advice to recruiters: Ask candidates to describe their biggest disappointment or failure.The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: the interviewer is analyzing your tonal and body language to see if there are/were any moral or ethical conflicts in your decision(s) and action(s). Additionally, they are looking for an answer that indicates if you were/are mature enough to take responsibility. The interviewer is trying to ascertain whether you can you be trusted to do the right thing.Also, this may be a follow-up to a Double Sided Question, with the first question asking about your biggest achievement. Because each person has different ideas of context and levels of disappointment you may want to clarify the question, “I’m not sure I understand the question, can you give me an example of potential disappointment or failure?” Their answer may be more or less than you were expecting, so adjust your answer accordingly.Preparing your answer ahead of time, allows you the opportunity to adjust the intensity of your answer to fit the situation. Questions like these are suppose to make you uncomfortable, however your preparation will alleviate some of the nervous and unintended body language that may indicate more of a problem than there really was.
- Evaluate their Maturity.
Garret’s advice to recruiters: Ask candidate where they see themselves in five years. Ask about greatest regrets or biggest weaknesses.The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: The first question is designed to see if you have a plan or if you are just coasting through life, stopping at whatever job comes your way. Proactive people have a plan, where do you want to be in 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. Design your answer around this plan to be brief but provide just enough detail to answer the question. If your plan does not include this type of work in the future, don’t include that part. Your answer should focus on the job at present and your professional growth through accomplishments in that position. “Well that’s an interesting question. As you have described this position, I believe my short term objectives would be to ____.” Followed up by medium and then long-range goals with the caveat that there is much room for flexibility based on professional growth within the organization. Develop a logical progression of your career and present this to the interviewer. This kind of answer presents the interviewer with a picture of you in the organization for the long hall, you are trainable, flexible, and an understanding that you can plan and execute a plan.The darker side of this question is for the interviewer to learn whether you are the whiny, complaining, bitter type or a mature individual. Preparation for this kind of question is important, you can practice your answer with a trusted friend to help rid it of any negativity. - Throw in a wrench.
Garret’s advice to recruiters: Alter the rules of the game for the candidate, see how they react to rapid changes. Change the setting for or during the interview by taking them to the lunch room for a cup of coffee or something. An unplanned for change of venue tends to create stress and show the candidates personality traits.The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: While Garret’s advice may sound like a normal part of an interview; the idea is to see how you “chat” them up while you are in line. Understand that from the time you enter the parking lot to the time you leave the parking lot; you are in the interview. Everything you do on property and say to anyone can be reported back to the interviewer.Personally, I know of an interviewer who purposely provides inaccurate directions to a candidate for the interview, with planted people at three different locations to provide new miss-direction in order to truly throw a candidate off balance.
While I do not agree with this tactic, it does provide a mechanism to break down the protective wall of a well-guarded candidate.
- Heed your gut.
Garret’s advice to recruiters: The candidate must provide at least one solid example for each of his WHIM qualities. If the candidate’s answers appear to be weak, venerable, or do not totally fit into the position – dig deeper and deeper until you uncover the real incompetence.The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: You should have at least two or, better yet, three solid examples of your efforts. Include what you did, the goal of the task/project, and most importantly the results of the task/project. Having two or three well practiced answers, you can show strength, depth, and mastery of the quality and may prevent the interviewer from digging deeper until they find a weakness. What may be a strong example to you may not appear to be strong in the new organization, having those extra examples may be the difference between a “thanks, but no thanks” letter and a second interview.
Beyond the 7 Tips for Hiring Great Employees listed above, Garret indicates the interviewer should try one more time to find the candidate incompatible with the position and/or organization. Rather than asking the question, “Why should we hire you?” the author suggests trying to dissuade the candidate from the job, simply stating that they [interviewer] is not certain the candidate is really qualified for the job or even wants it.
Try to sell [him/]her out of the job enough to examine one last time whether [he/]she thinks it’s right for [him/]her.
The Professional’s Edge advice to candidates: This is a slippery slope the interviewer is proceeding down. While it is wrong on so many levels, it is typical of many callous interviewers. However, answer it in the same way you would the question “Why should we hire you?” Initially, for the cover letter, you should have analyzed the position matching your knowledge, abilities, and skills to the position. That information is good for the initial interviews, however with each successive interview you should revisit the analysis with the information gleaned from each interview to add, change, or modify your answer to this question. Each piece of information you obtain about the industry, organization, and position allows you to position yourself as the best candidate.
Don’t forget to use this same analysis to complete your Thank-You letter(http://wp.me/p1fSNS-5m).
Find specific and other topics below